Tag Archives: Cheer LTD

A Message From the USASF Board of Directors – April 5th, 2012

The Board appreciates the recommendations recently made by the Rules Committee and, as always, gave them serious consideration before issuing the revised rules that we feel are in the best interest of our sport and its athletes. Given the feedback we received, it seems appropriate to now address the developments that led the Board to initially issue these rules.

USASF LogoThe Board has a deep respect for the technical qualifications of the members of the Rules Committee and sincerely appreciates the hard work of every member. The Board believes that much focus has been given to important detailed technical points; however, there are broader issues involving the rules that deserve immediate attention. Because of this, the Board felt compelled to address what it believes are critical and urgent issues. Addressing these issues is consistent with the mission of the USASF, which is to create a safe and positive environment for All Star athletes and to grow the sport.

An inordinate number of injuries in tumbling appears not to have been adequately addressed by the rules. All technical areas (stunts, pyramids and basket tosses) have restrictions to enhance safety. When particular skills are deemed to be unsafe for the vast number of athletes involved in our sport, rules and restrictions need to be created. If there are skills that appear to be creating injuries, then it is the responsibility of the USASF to address these skills for the overall benefit of our athletes and our sport.

In recent days, some have advocated leaving decisions on what specific skills can be performed by an athlete strictly to the coaches and athletes themselves, thereby eliminating any restrictions. The result would be allowing virtually any skill to be attempted. The Board believes that this approach would have a devastating effect on our sport (envision four high pyramids, basket tosses from shoulder stands, and double or triple backs with multiple twists on the floor and in baskets).

The Board is also concerned about the continued lack of serious competition in many of the divisions that have been created. While the concept of level play has been positive for our sport, the very large number of divisions inherently creates a lack of serious competition in many circumstances. There are now more than 140 divisions. This is counter to creating what is an essential element of any legitimate sport, which is competition. The Board believes that decisions must be made over the coming months to create a more balanced and robust competitive environment.

The image and appearance policy addresses the increasing criticism about the general appearance of our athletes during competition and the unflattering media stories that have focused on how our sport is presenting its athletes, particularly those in the younger age groups.

Regarding process, the Board appreciates the procedure whereby the NACCC recommends rules to the Rules Committee, and the Committee then considers these recommendations, as well as those the Committee develops itself. The Rules Committee then recommends specific rules to the Board, the vast majority of which have historically been passed. However, the Board has always reserved the right to pass certain rules it develops itself if such rules are deemed to address issues of important and immediate concern. Going forward, in an effort to advance the USASF’s mission in a more substantial and timely way, the Board will give as clear a direction as possible to the Rules Committee as it relates to the development of rules.

While fully respecting and appreciating each individual’s right to freely express themselves, it is imperative that those who are involved with the USASF on an official basis or project conduct themselves constructively and professionally with respect for their peers working within the organization. Based on the developments that have recently transpired regarding these rules, the USASF will soon be issuing its own standards of conduct relative to official work being done on behalf of the USASF. To hold an official position, including a USASF committee position, the USASF will require that members discuss and address these issues within the organization’s official structure.

Finally, the Board, which is composed of both event producers and coaches, believes that it is imperative to put the overall good of the sport before personal or company interests. This includes event companies and gym companies. The Board believes everyone should keep this principle at the forefront of our future efforts in furthering the USASF’s mission to create a safe and positive environment for All Star athletes and to grow the sport.

Board of Directors

Jim Chadwick (Chairman), Mike Burgess (USA), Justin Carrier (NCA), Brian Elza (Premier Athletics), Jeff Fowlkes (CHEERSPORT), Mack Hirshberg (Mac’s Cheer), Gwen Holtsclaw* (Cheer Ltd.), Happy Hooper (Ace All Stars), Dan Kessler (Jamfest), April LaFramboise (JAM Brands), Colleen Little (IEP), Jody Melton (Cheer Athletics), Catherine Morris (UDA), John Newby (UCA), Elaine Pascale (World Cup), Steve Peterson (IASF/USASF), James Speed* (GymTyme), Lance Wagers (ACA)

*Consultants to the Board

A Message From the USASF Board of Directors

IEP Responds to March 28, 2012 USASF Board of Directors Annoucement

IEP LogoMarch 29, 2012 – On March 28, 2012, an announcement was sent to the USASF membership on behalf of the USASF Board of Directors. This announcement explained that a proposal was accepted by the USASF Board that will take effect for the 2012-2013 season. Per the announcement, the proposal was based off of a “joint presentation of CHEERSPORT, JamBrands and Varsity with an endorsement from Cheer Limited”.

The Independent Event Producers (IEP) were not consulted or informed in any way of this proposal nor were they involved in any data collection for any case studies to support the proposal. The IEP feels strongly that the proposal did not warrant the immediate action taken and that circumventing the appropriate process and the coaches input was detrimental to our industry. Unfortunately, this is yet another example of lack of balance and democracy within our governing body.

The mission of IEP remains our focus today. Our main objective is to “collectively influence the cheerleading and dance industry, to promote independence and work to ensure our long-term viability in the industry”. The IEP is made up of companies representing over 250 events. Please visit www.WeAreIEP.com for more information on IEP member companies.

IEP Responds to March 28, 2012 USASF Board of Directors Annoucement

USASF Critical Updates for 2012-13

USASF LogoDear USASF Members,

The primary missions of USASF are to promote the safety of the all-star cheer athletes and to help grow the sport. The USASF Board of Directors is charged with establishing policies and procedures consistent with that mission. The Board typically does this through normal operating procedures but has the authority and in fact, the responsibility, to act outside of those normal procedures if they feel a critical situation exists that threatens that mission. This is not unlike professional football that recently instituted a number of emergency measures to address the issue of head trauma and concussions. They felt the safety of their athletes and the long term health of the sport was at risk so they acted very quickly and without following their normal procedures.

During our March 28th Board meeting conference call, a joint presentation of CHEERSPORT, JamBrands and Varsity with an endorsement from Cheer Limited was made to the Board that stated they believe immediate action was needed for the long term interest of all-star cheer and its’ athletes. The proposal was the result of analyzing their own internal data relating to these issues as well as extensive discussions with gym owners, coaches, athletes and parents.

One of the primary concerns related to the negative impact of the increased focus on elite tumbling skills. Most programs report an increase in the number and severity of injuries as the tumbling skills become more difficult. The focus on elite tumbling also restricts the growth of the sport because it limits the type of athletes who can compete. It was agreed among these event producers to use score sheets that maximize tumbling scores at “half plus one” to create a majority. This will allow for more diversity of athletes among all teams. Beyond tumbling recommendations, the group also proposed several changes to the age grid and divisions including establishing a minimum age in all senior divisions. There were various reasons for all the changes but the consensus was that all these changes would enhance the sport and were necessary.

The proposal was accepted by the Board and will take effect for the 2012/2013 season. While the Rules Committee has been charged with writing the specific rules, an outline of the changes is attached in an effort to get the word out as quickly as possible.

A second issue addressed during the Board meeting today was the approval of the attached Image & Appearance Policy and Etiquette. This is in response to the input gathered during the Summer Regional Meetings and a survey conducted during January /February, in which 2,700 USASF members participated, indicating uniform, choreography, and make up issues needed to be addressed to enhance the legitimacy of the sport.

Jim Chadwick

President, USASF

USASF Image Policy

USASF Image Etiquette

USASF Rules to Implement for 2012-13

Cheer LTD: Nationals at Canam 2011

Cheer LTD Nationals at Canam took place on March 19-20 in Myrtle Beach, SC. This event had 149 All*Star Cheer teams compete. This event was a qualifier for Worlds. Paid Bids were awarded to:

  • Rockstar Cheer “Rolling Stones” (Senior Large Limited Coed L5)

Worlds At Large Bids were awarded to:

  • Cheer Tyme “Open Addiction” (International Open Coed L6)
  • Elite Cheer and Dance “Max 5″ (Senior Large Limited Coed L5)
  • Ultimate Athletics “Elite” (Senior Small L5)

Event Page

The event had 149 All*Star Cheer Teams in 50 Divisions for an average of 2.98 teams per division.

All*Star Cheer By Level

  • Level 1 – 28 Teams in 10 Divisions (2.80 Average)
  • Level 2 – 27 Teams in 9 Divisions (3.00)
  • Level 3 – 27 Teams in 10 Divisions (2.70)
  • Level 4 – 17 Teams in 5 Divisions (3.40)
  • Level 4.2 – 6 Teams in 2 Divisions (3.00)
  • Level 5 – 33 Teams in 11 Divisions (3.00)
  • Level 6 – 1 Team in 1 Division (1.00)
  • Special Needs – 10 Teams in 2 Divisions (5.00)

All*Star Cheer By Age

  • Tiny – 8 Teams in 3 Divisions (2.67 Average)
  • Mini – 13 Teams in 5 Divisions (2.60)
  • Youth – 19 Teams in 7 Divisions (2.71)
  • Junior – 34 Teams in 11 Divisions (3.09)
  • Senior – 54 Teams in 18 Divisions (3.00)
  • Senior Open – 5 Teams in 2 Divisions (2.50)
  • International/Open – 6 Teams in 2 Divisions (3.00)
  • Special Needs – 10 Teams in 2 Divisions (5.00)

Cheer LTD: Soffe Missouri Open 2011

Cheer LTD Soffe Missouri Open took place on February 6th in St. Louis, MO. This event had 19 All*Star Cheer, 2 Traditional Cheer, and 1 All*Star Dance teams compete.

Event Page

The event had 19 All*Star Cheer Teams in 9 Divisions for an average of 2.11 teams per division and 1 All*Star Dance team in 1 division for an average of 1.00 teams per division.

All*Star Cheer By Level

  • Level 1 – 6 Teams in 4 Divisions (1.50 Average)
  • Level 2 – 8 Teams in 3 Divisions (2.67)
  • Level 3 – 5 Teams in 2 Divisions (2.50)

All*Star Cheer By Age

  • Tiny – 1 Team in 1 Division (1.00 Average)
  • Mini – 2 Teams in 1 Division (2.00)
  • Youth – 6 Teams in 3 Divisions (2.00)
  • Junior – 4 Teams in 2 Divisions (2.00)
  • Senior – 6 Teams in 2 Divisions (3.00)