Tag Archives: ACA

USASF Increases Gym Owner Representation on Board of Directors

USASF LogoThe USASF Board of Directors is pleased to announce a significant step for gym owner representation in the leadership of the USASF by raising the total gym owners on the Board of Directors from 4 to 6.

The role of the USASF Board of Directors is to insure that the mission of the USASF is accomplished by the work done within the 11 Cheer and 3 Dance Committees, made up of coaches, gym owners and event producers. Two key committees are the National Advisory Board (NAB) and the National Allstar Cheerleading Coaches Congress (NACCC). The NAB is composed of regionally elected representatives, drawn from the Regional Advisory Boards, and oversees Image, Appearance and Ethical issues. The NACCC Executive Committee was established in 2011, electing regional representatives for coaches to give input in the Rules process.

In October, Varsity designated its event producer seat held by Lance Wagers of ACA to become a gym owner seat recommended by the NACCC. In accordance with the USASF by-laws, and with input from gym owners, coaches and event producers, the Board designated another seat to be filled by a gym owner. Finally, the term for the gym owner seat held by Jody Melton, co-owner of Cheer Athletics, expired as of November, so another gym owner was elected to take his place.

As the USASF has grown, it has taken great strides to include and increase the voice of coaches and gym owners in the organization. Of significance was the merger with NACCC in 2005, creating the official coaches organization within the USASF. At that time, 4 seats were added to the USASF Board of Directors designated for gym owners/coaches. Now, two more gym owner seats have been added.

Please help us congratulate the following gym owners who were unanimously elected to the USASF Board of Directors on November 5th, 2012.

  • Kathy Penree, CNY Storm, Herkimer, NY (2 year term)
  • Kristen Rosario, Top Gun All Stars, Miami, FL (2 year term)
  • Morton Bergue, Cheergyms.com, Concord, CA (1 year term)

To view the full list of Board of Directors members, click here.

Varsity to Recommend Changes to the USASF Board of Directors

Varsity All Star LogoDear All Star Community:

Since the founding of the USASF, Varsity has embraced the principle of having voices from the entire All Star Community represented.

After discussions with many coaches and gym owners at USASF regional meetings, we felt that the Board would benefit from additional gym owner input. This will be accomplished by ACA, a Varsity company and founding member of the USASF, designating its permanent seat to a gym owner recommended by the NACCC. Lance Wagers, ACA founder and president, has graciously offered to make this position available in order to support All Star’s development at this critical time.

USASF LogoIn addition, after consulting with several other USASF Board members, gym owners and the NACCC, Varsity will recommend that an additional non-permanent gym owner seat be added to the USASF Board, with the proviso that the NACCC ensures that gyms of all sizes and geographical areas be represented. We will present this to the USASF Board at the next scheduled meeting for immediate consideration.

The net effect of the above will result in one less Varsity event producer seat and two additional gym owner positions. We feel like this is an important step as we all move ahead together to address the primary issues facing the entire All Star community.

John Newby

Executive Vice President, Varsity All Star

A Message From the USASF Board of Directors – April 5th, 2012

The Board appreciates the recommendations recently made by the Rules Committee and, as always, gave them serious consideration before issuing the revised rules that we feel are in the best interest of our sport and its athletes. Given the feedback we received, it seems appropriate to now address the developments that led the Board to initially issue these rules.

USASF LogoThe Board has a deep respect for the technical qualifications of the members of the Rules Committee and sincerely appreciates the hard work of every member. The Board believes that much focus has been given to important detailed technical points; however, there are broader issues involving the rules that deserve immediate attention. Because of this, the Board felt compelled to address what it believes are critical and urgent issues. Addressing these issues is consistent with the mission of the USASF, which is to create a safe and positive environment for All Star athletes and to grow the sport.

An inordinate number of injuries in tumbling appears not to have been adequately addressed by the rules. All technical areas (stunts, pyramids and basket tosses) have restrictions to enhance safety. When particular skills are deemed to be unsafe for the vast number of athletes involved in our sport, rules and restrictions need to be created. If there are skills that appear to be creating injuries, then it is the responsibility of the USASF to address these skills for the overall benefit of our athletes and our sport.

In recent days, some have advocated leaving decisions on what specific skills can be performed by an athlete strictly to the coaches and athletes themselves, thereby eliminating any restrictions. The result would be allowing virtually any skill to be attempted. The Board believes that this approach would have a devastating effect on our sport (envision four high pyramids, basket tosses from shoulder stands, and double or triple backs with multiple twists on the floor and in baskets).

The Board is also concerned about the continued lack of serious competition in many of the divisions that have been created. While the concept of level play has been positive for our sport, the very large number of divisions inherently creates a lack of serious competition in many circumstances. There are now more than 140 divisions. This is counter to creating what is an essential element of any legitimate sport, which is competition. The Board believes that decisions must be made over the coming months to create a more balanced and robust competitive environment.

The image and appearance policy addresses the increasing criticism about the general appearance of our athletes during competition and the unflattering media stories that have focused on how our sport is presenting its athletes, particularly those in the younger age groups.

Regarding process, the Board appreciates the procedure whereby the NACCC recommends rules to the Rules Committee, and the Committee then considers these recommendations, as well as those the Committee develops itself. The Rules Committee then recommends specific rules to the Board, the vast majority of which have historically been passed. However, the Board has always reserved the right to pass certain rules it develops itself if such rules are deemed to address issues of important and immediate concern. Going forward, in an effort to advance the USASF’s mission in a more substantial and timely way, the Board will give as clear a direction as possible to the Rules Committee as it relates to the development of rules.

While fully respecting and appreciating each individual’s right to freely express themselves, it is imperative that those who are involved with the USASF on an official basis or project conduct themselves constructively and professionally with respect for their peers working within the organization. Based on the developments that have recently transpired regarding these rules, the USASF will soon be issuing its own standards of conduct relative to official work being done on behalf of the USASF. To hold an official position, including a USASF committee position, the USASF will require that members discuss and address these issues within the organization’s official structure.

Finally, the Board, which is composed of both event producers and coaches, believes that it is imperative to put the overall good of the sport before personal or company interests. This includes event companies and gym companies. The Board believes everyone should keep this principle at the forefront of our future efforts in furthering the USASF’s mission to create a safe and positive environment for All Star athletes and to grow the sport.

Board of Directors

Jim Chadwick (Chairman), Mike Burgess (USA), Justin Carrier (NCA), Brian Elza (Premier Athletics), Jeff Fowlkes (CHEERSPORT), Mack Hirshberg (Mac’s Cheer), Gwen Holtsclaw* (Cheer Ltd.), Happy Hooper (Ace All Stars), Dan Kessler (Jamfest), April LaFramboise (JAM Brands), Colleen Little (IEP), Jody Melton (Cheer Athletics), Catherine Morris (UDA), John Newby (UCA), Elaine Pascale (World Cup), Steve Peterson (IASF/USASF), James Speed* (GymTyme), Lance Wagers (ACA)

*Consultants to the Board

A Message From the USASF Board of Directors

American Cheerleaders Association 2011-12

American Cheerleaders Association Nationals took place on January 15-16, 2012 in Fort Worth, TX. This event had 216 All*Star Cheer teams compete and was a qualifier for Cheer Worlds. Paid Bids were awarded to:

  • ACA LogoCheer Athletics “Panthers” (Senior Medium L5)
  • Cheer Athletics “Wildcats” (International Open Coed L5)
  • Spirit of Texas (Senior Medium Coed L5)

At Large Bids were awarded to:

  • Champion Cheer “Heat” (Senior Small L5)
  • Cheer Athletics “Fierce Katz” (International Open L5)
  • Cheer Athletics “LadyKatz” (International Open L6)
  • Cheer Station “Senior Black” (Senior Medium L5)
  • Cheers & More “Senior Elite Rebels” (Senior Small L5)
  • Texas Lonestar (Senior Medium L5)
  • Texas Lonestar (Senior Medium Coed L5)
  • Twister Cheer Company (Senior Large Coed L5)
  • Woodlands Elite “Commanders” (International Open Coed L5)

Event Page | ACA Nationals 2012 Results

The event had 216 All*Star Cheer Teams in 65 Divisions for an average of 3.32 teams per division.

All*Star Cheer By Level

  • Level 1 – 47 Teams in 11 Divisions (4.27 Average)
  • Level 2 – 57 Teams in 13 Divisions (4.38)
  • Level 3 – 47 Teams in 12 Divisions (3.92)
  • Level 4 – 28 Teams in 11 Divisions (2.55)
  • Level 4.2 – 3 Teams in 2 Divisions (1.50)
  • Restricted – 6 Teams in 3 Divisions (2.00)
  • Level 5 – 27 Teams in 12 Divisions (2.25)
  • Level 6 – 1 Team in 1 Division (1.00)

All*Star Cheer By Age

  • Tiny – 6 Teams in 2 Divisions (3.00 Average)
  • Mini – 20 Teams in 6 Divisions (3.33)
  • Youth – 36 Teams in 10 Divisions (3.60)
  • Junior – 60 Teams in 15 Divisions (4.00)
  • Senior – 88 Teams in 29 Divisions (3.03)
  • International – 6 Teams in 3 Divisions (2.00)

Varsity All Star Scoring for 2011-12

Varsity LogoVarsity All Star’s 2011-12 scoring system is now available. This system is used by most Varsity event producers, with All Star Challenge being the notable exception. We’ll publish our thoughts on the changes later, but here are some of the changes mentioned by Varsity:

  • All 2-Day events using the Varsity Scoring System will be weighted 25% for Day 1 and 75% for Day 2.
  • All events using the Varsity Scoring System will weigh score sheet sections the same:
    • 40% – Building (Stunts, Pyramids, and Tosses)
    • 30% – Tumbling (Standing, Running, and Jumps)
    • 20% – Overall Routine (Motions/Dance, Formations/Transitions, and Performance)
    • 10% – Creativity (Routine and Skill)
  • Tumbling Deductions have been reduced to .25 for a Bobble and .50 for a Fall. (Last season was .50 for a Bobble and 1.00 for a Fall)
  • Event Producers will still be able to choose between Panel and Category judging
  • Final Score and Perfection Percent will be published online.

Varsity All Star 2011-12 Scoring System Update, Grid, and Deductions